Evidence & national context

The public record behind HB 503.

We did not wait for a contract to learn the file. This page assembles the public and prior-study evidence that frames the study — what Kentucky pays, where it ranks, why the General Assembly acted, and how other states have done this. Every figure is sourced.

Figures below are drawn from named public sources (Kentucky Court of Justice, the Legislature, NCSC, and Chief Justice testimony) with citations. They are the starting evidence base for the study, not its findings.
The mandate

What HB 503 actually requires.

“…$1,000,000 in fiscal year 2026-2027 to support a contract with an external consultant to conduct a comprehensive salary and compensation study for the elected and nonelected personnel of the Judicial Branch… results… to the Interim Joint Committee on Appropriations and Revenue by July 1, 2027.”

HB 503 (2026 Regular Session), Part II §(3), enrolled bill. Source: legislature.ky.gov

HB 503 is the Legislative Branch budget; the study runs through the LRC, which is why this is an RFI. The statute is explicit on scope: both elected and non-elected personnel, and three review areas — current classifications, compensation levels, and market competitiveness — plus adjustment recommendations.

$1.0M
Appropriated for the study (FY2026-27)
Jul 1
2027
Results due to Appropriations & Revenue
$327.7M
FY2026 court-operations budget (87% personnel)
Why the General Assembly acted

Kentucky pays its judiciary near the bottom of the country.

This is not opinion. It is the consistent, on-the-record finding of Kentucky’s own Chief Justices, citing the national benchmark.

48th
National rank, general-jurisdiction (Circuit) judges

NCSC, cited by Chief Justice Debra Lambert, Nov 2025. WKMS

~20%
Below the national average for judges

Commonly cited gap; ~$32K (25%) below in 2022. NKyTribune

~17%
Judicial-branch staff pay below executive-branch peers

Chief Justice Lambert budget address, Nov 2025. WKMS

“Successful attorneys may have previously chosen to take a cut in pay to serve as a judge because of the potential for good retirement benefits, but that doesn’t happen anymore.”

Chief Justice Debra Lambert, Nov 2025 budget address, requesting a 15% raise (~$37M) for all judicial-branch employees. Intermediate appellate judges ranked 40th nationally at $147,562 (NCSC 2023).
A decade of stagnation

Twelve years, about seven percent.

In the twelve years to FY2022, Kentucky justices and judges received only a roughly 7% cumulative increase — four small raises, and nothing in between.

Recent catch-up has helped: Circuit judges rose about 20% over four years to roughly $156,000, and FY2026 added another ~3% across the bench. But the base was so far behind that Kentucky still ranks 48th. The current pay scale, phased FY2025 to FY2026, is documented on the market analysis page.

In 2022 Kentucky ranked 51st of 55 U.S. states and territories for judicial pay. That is the hole HB 503 asks the study to measure and help close.

Kentucky judicial raises by year

Annual percentage increase. Source: Chief Justice Minton FY2022-24 budget testimony (2022); Kentucky Court of Justice (FY2025-26).

The other 3,300

A career workforce clustered at the bottom of the scale.

The elected bench is only 412 people. The roughly 3,300 career employees who run the courts are where the classification-and-equity work is, and where the pay problem is sharpest.

82%

In pay grades 7–11

About 82% of judicial-branch employees sit in the lower clerical and court-support grades — deputy clerks, court staff, and program officers.

Chief Justice Minton testimony, 2022.

$24K

Starting pay, FY2022

Starting salaries in grades 7–11 ran roughly $23,604 to $30,936 — near-poverty wages for the people who keep the courts open.

Chief Justice Minton testimony, 2022.

120

Elected circuit clerks

Clerk pay is set by county population in eight groups, from $76,682 to $115,789 — a real structure the study must reconcile with internal equity.

Kentucky Court of Justice, clerk salary schedule.

The categories the study must classify. Deputy clerks (the largest single bloc), court reporters, trial-court administrators, pretrial services officers, Court Designated Workers (juvenile intake, Pay Grade 09, $34,910–$46,466), and AOC central administrative staff — across all 120 counties. Per-classification headcounts are not published; we request the AOC position roster at kick-off.
How Kentucky sets judicial pay

No standing commission — and Kentucky once tried to build one.

Today, judicial salaries are set in the biennial judicial-branch budget bill, on the Chief Justice’s recommendation (KRS 48.100 / 48.110), constrained by Constitution §120, which bars reducing a judge’s pay during a term. There is no independent commission in the loop.

In 2015, HB 469 would have created a Kentucky Citizens’ Commission on Judicial Compensation — a nine-member body weighing inflation, other-state and federal pay, retention, the CPI, and private-sector comparables. It died in a conference committee and never became law. That failed design is a ready-made, made-in-Kentucky governance template this study can put back on the table.

The 2015 rubric (a reusable framework)

Factors HB 469 would have weighed

  • ✔  Overall economic climate and rate of inflation (CPI)
  • ✔  Compensation of judges in other states and the federal government
  • ✔  The Commonwealth’s interest in attracting and retaining qualified judges
  • ✔  Value of comparable private-sector service
  • ✔  Compensation of other public officials and attorneys
  • ✔  The time demands of judicial office

HB 469 (2015 RS), Senate Committee Substitute. Source: legislature.ky.gov

Prior-study precedent

We are not inventing the method. Other states have done this.

The study draws on the strongest precedents for judicial-compensation methodology, governance, and market benchmarking — so Kentucky gets a proven approach, tailored to the Commonwealth.

New York — standing compensation commission

The model for an independent commission using a defined multi-factor rubric, and the clearest precedent for handling regional cost-of-living. Best single template for a Kentucky governance recommendation.

North Carolina — 2023 catch-up raises

Legislatively enacted increases (district judges +24% to $162,620; superior +13% to $169,125) — a comparator for the magnitude of a credible catch-up.

Virginia & Maine — independent assessments

Virginia’s NCSC judicial workload assessment (2024) and Maine’s Judicial Compensation Commission report (2013) — precedents for data-driven, independently produced court studies.

NCSC & the national literature

The NCSC Survey of Judicial Salaries (the national benchmark, cost-of-living-adjusted via the C2ER index) and Raftery’s “How States Set Judicial Salaries” (Judicature, 2023) anchor the market analysis and the governance options.

Sources

Kentucky Court of Justice, Judicial Salaries & Circuit Clerk Salary Schedule — kycourts.gov

Kentucky Court of Justice, FY2023 Annual Report — kycourts.gov

HB 503 (2026 RS), enrolled bill — legislature.ky.gov

HB 469 (2015 RS), judicial compensation commission — legislature.ky.gov

Chief Justice Lambert budget address, Nov 2025 — WKMS

Chief Justice Minton FY2022-24 testimony — NKyTribune

NCSC Survey of Judicial Salaries — ncsc.org

Judicial Branch budget statement (HB 264 / HB 504) — forwardky.com

From evidence to analysis

See the pay scale, live.

The market analysis turns this evidence into an interactive exhibit — the real pay scale, the clerk schedule, and a pay-range workbench.

Scan to open this portal
Scan to open it now